Since 2014
Two dysfunctions in high-tech research and development
Public Policy and Administration
View Archive Info| Field | Value | |
| Title |
Two dysfunctions in high-tech research and development
Dvi aukštųjų technologijų tyrimo ir vysymo disfunkcijos |
|
| Creator |
Oyama, Kazunobu
|
|
| Subject |
Reverse Hierarchy; Paradox of Conservatism by Innovation; Economic Factors; Organizational Factors; Case Studies
reversyvi hierarchija; sąstingio inovacija paradoksas; ekonominiai faktoriai; organizaciniai faktoriai; atvejų analizė |
|
| Description |
In this paper, I discuss organizational problems in the field of high-tech research and development in a firm. In particular, two dysfunctional phenomena are very important because they pose peculiar problems in Research and Development activities. The first problem is reverse hierarchy wherein the scientific knowledge hierarchy expands in a direction that is reverse to that of the power hierarchy. In high-tech industries, forefront knowledge is concentrated in junior scientists who hold little power with regard to investment decision-making. On the other hand, top managers of the firm who are located at the top of the power hierarchy usually cannot comprehend forefront scientific knowledge. The second problem is the paradox of conservatism by innovation, which means that successful technological innovation causes the members of the firm to resist further innovation involving radical change in the fundamental structure of core technology. In other words, members of the organization are inclined to make only small improvements in technological innovation. The greater the success, the stronger and longer lasting is the conservatism. A way to resolve the first problem is to designate senior scientists for positions in top management. As they are more familiar with science than business managers, they can understand forefront scientific knowledge to a certain extent. However, they tend to cling to past innovations that they themselves have devised. Thus, a second problem arises from the solution for the first. I analyse potential solutions to these problems through Japanese case studies. Japanese companies try to resolve the first problem, that of reverse hierarchy, in two major ways. The first one is to expand the discretion of scientists. The second method involves utilizing middle managers as mediators between the top business managers and the junior scientists. The second problem, the paradox of conservatism by innovation can be resolved through organizational development that involves educating company members on the nature of technological change in the modern era of innovation.
Straipsnyje analizuojamos dvi pagrindinės problemos (disfunkciniai fenomenai), su kuriomis susiduriama tiriant ir vystant aukštąsias technologijas: 1) reversinė hierarchija ir 2) sąstingio inovacija paradoksas. Autorius analizuoja ekonominių ir organizacinių veiksnių įtaką šių problemų struktūrai atskleisti, pasitelkia atvejų analizę ir nurodo tris problemų sprendimo priemones: a) mokslininkų diskretiškumo stiprinimas, b) vidurinės grandies vadybininkų tarpininkavimas, c) organizacijos plėtra, apimanti mokymus apie technologinių pokyčių prigimtį. |
|
| Publisher |
Mykolas Romeris University
|
|
| Contributor |
—
— |
|
| Date |
2013-09-23
|
|
| Type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — — |
|
| Format |
application/pdf
|
|
| Identifier |
https://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/public-policy-and-administration/article/view/1217
|
|
| Source |
Public Policy and Administration; Vol 1, No 30 (2009): Public Policy and Administration; 82–91
Viešoji politika ir administravimas; Vol 1, No 30 (2009): Public Policy and Administration; 82–91 2029-2872 1648-2603 |
|
| Language |
eng
|
|
| Relation |
https://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/public-policy-and-administration/article/view/1217/1165
|
|
| Rights |
Copyright (c) 2014 Public Policy and Administration
|
|