Guidance and Technology: An Assessment of Project Intervention and Promoted Technologies
GSTF Journal on Business Review
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
Guidance and Technology: An Assessment of Project Intervention and Promoted Technologies
|
|
Creator |
O. Pede, Valerien
D. McKinley, Justin Sharma, Raman Kumar, Anurag |
|
Subject |
conservation agriculture; India; propensity score matching; resource-conserving technologies; selection bias; zerotillage
|
|
Description |
This study used primary data, collected as part of theCereal Systems Initiative for South Asia (CSISA) project tocompare net returns and cost efficiency between farmers who arebeneficiaries of the project to farmers who are not beneficiaries.Additionally, non-beneficiary farmers who use the promotedtechnologies from the project are compared to other nonbeneficiaryfarmers who do not use the promoted technologies.Propensity score matching is used to account for selection biaswhen comparing the outcomes of beneficiary and control groups.Results indicate higher return for project recipients as well asfarmers who use the CSISA promoted resource-conservingtechnologies (RCTs).
|
|
Publisher |
GSTF Journal on Business Review (GBR)
|
|
Contributor |
—
|
|
Date |
2012-10-01
|
|
Type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — |
|
Format |
application/pdf
|
|
Identifier |
http://dl6.globalstf.org/index.php/gbr/article/view/1248
|
|
Source |
GSTF Journal on Business Review (GBR); Vol 2, No 2 (2012): Journal on Business Review (GBR)
ISSN: 2251-2888 2010-4804 |
|
Language |
eng
|
|
Relation |
http://dl6.globalstf.org/index.php/gbr/article/view/1248/1264
|
|
Rights |
Copyright (c) 2017 GSTF Journal on Business Review (GBR)
|
|