Since 2014
Appendix 4.2: Confidential Cable from the US Embassy in Manila, “Supreme Court Justice Calls for Lifting of Martial Law,” 7 July 1976
Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies
View Archive Info| Field | Value | |
| Title |
Appendix 4.2: Confidential Cable from the US Embassy in Manila, “Supreme Court Justice Calls for Lifting of Martial Law,” 7 July 1976
|
|
| Creator |
Philippine Journal of Third World Studies, Kasarinlan
|
|
| Subject |
—
— — |
|
| Description |
Widely known as the “Great Dissenter,” this cable shows Justice Claudio Teehankee Sr.’s ability to counter Marcos with the latter’s legalistic finesse, i.e., by stating that mere advocacy of the lifting of martial law was legally permissible since the president himself declared that it was only a temporary necessity. Ambassador William H. Sullivan noted that Teehankee was “somewhat nervous” when asked about his “activist” stance, which suggests that in 1976, Justice Teehankee knew how to confine his opposition to martial rule within the bounds of the law. Justice Antonio Barredo, meanwhile, is portrayed in this cable as someone who considers himself privy to president Marcos’s thoughts, or in any case fully trusts the wisdom of the president.
|
|
| Publisher |
Third World Studies Center
|
|
| Contributor |
—
|
|
| Date |
2017-12-04
|
|
| Type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion — — |
|
| Format |
application/pdf
|
|
| Identifier |
https://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/kasarinlan/article/view/5903
|
|
| Source |
Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies; Vol 27, No 1-2-Vol 28, No 1-2 (2012-2013): Marcos Pa Rin! The Legacy and the Curse of the Marcos Regime; 469-472
2012-080X 0116–0923 |
|
| Language |
eng
|
|
| Relation |
https://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/kasarinlan/article/view/5903/5266
|
|
| Coverage |
—
— — |
|
| Rights |
Copyright (c) 2017 Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies
|
|