Record Details

The US Compliance Assurance Process: A Relational Signalling Perspective

Journal of Tax Administration

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title The US Compliance Assurance Process: A Relational Signalling Perspective
 
Creator de Widt, Dennis
Mulligan, Emer
Oats, Lynne
 
Description Cooperative compliance programmes have been introduced in various tax jurisdictions, with its pioneers including Australia, Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands, the UK and the US. Such programmes are part of a wider trend in regulatory systems that emerged in the 1980s, and attempt to better balance interests between the tax authority and corporate taxpayers, and seek to reflect a more collaborative working method, as promoted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). This paper examines the US cooperative compliance arrangement, known as the Compliance Assurance Process (CAP), and probes the nature of the relationship that ensues between the regulator and regulatee under CAP, the motivations of each party to the arrangement, and the manner in which the relationship is (or is not) sustained. This paper sheds light on such matters pertaining to CAP by examining its evolution and operation through the lens of regulation theory, drawing in particular on the work of Etienne (2013), who develops a typology of ideal type interactions and relational signals in regulatory settings. It is also informed by interview data from two separate studies involving interviews with senior in-house tax executives/advisors. Drawing on Etienne’s typology facilitates a better understanding of the limits of cooperative compliance in the context of large businesses, particularly in the US environment. This paper shows the importance of adequately capturing the motivations of regulator and regulatee, demonstrating they do not carry equal weight nor have they remained stable over time, and addresses the implications of these differences for the success of an initiative such as CAP. It also demonstrates that interactions between regulator and regulatee follow multiple logics, and highlights and critiques the high level of interaction required, especially during the initial stage of responsive regulation-based relationships. The paper concludes with some broader considerations around regulator-regulatee relationships, including the potential role for recent technological innovations in this context.Keywords: cooperative compliance, Compliance Assurance Process, responsive regulation, Etienne
 
Publisher Journal of Tax Administration
 
Contributor
 
Date 2019-02-11
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://jota.website/index.php/JoTA/article/view/221
 
Source Journal of Tax Administration; Vol 5, No 1 (2019): Special Issue: Co-operative Compliance
2059-190X
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://jota.website/index.php/JoTA/article/view/221/162
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Tax Administration