Record Details

Measuring public sector innovation

Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Measuring public sector innovation
 
Creator ȘANDOR, Sorin Dan; Department of Public Administration and Management, Faculty of Political, Administrative and Communication Sciences, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
 
Subject innovation; measurement; European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard
 
Description The goal of this paper is to present and discuss the difficulties in defining and measuring innovation. The large number of existing definitions is yet failing to make the necessary distinction between innovation and other related concepts. There is no agreement about the most relevant dimensions of innovation and, without a proper definition of innovation, measurement is more difficult. Several methods and attempts of measurement– Awards and Surveys – are identifying different meanings and characteristics of innovation. A more in-depth analysis of a pilot exercise in measuring innovation, namely the European Public Sector Innovation Scoreboard 2013, is done in order to examine its methodology and the validity of its findings for the specific case of Romania. The need for an innovative public sector is generally recognized, and present measurement attempts are actually overestimating the level of innovation. In order to assess this correctly a clearer and narrower definition is needed, the framework of the innovative process needs to be further investigated and research designs have to be improved
 
Publisher Babes Bolyai University
 
Contributor
 
Date 2018-06-29
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/562
10.24193/tras.54E.8
 
Source Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences; 2018: Issue No. 54 E/June; 125-137
1842-2845
10.24193/tras.54E
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/562/551
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2018 Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences