Record Details

The Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Social Loafing in Ho Chi Minh City-based Enterprises

VNU Journal of Science: Economics and Business

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title The Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Social Loafing in Ho Chi Minh City-based Enterprises
Quan hệ giữa công bằng tổ chức và tính hững hờ tập thể - Trường hợp các doanh nghiệp tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh
 
Creator Thanh, Vu Ba
Toan, Ngo Van
 
Description Social loafing is the phenomenon of a person exerting less effort to achieve a goal when they work in a group than when they work alone, and it is influenced by organizational justice. This study investigates the relationship between organizational justice and social loafing in Ho Chi Minh City - based enterprises through quantitative analysis. The result show that only distribution justice and procedural justice produce an opposite effect on employee’s social loafing.
Keywords
Organizational justice, social loafing, enterprise
References
[1] Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of personality and social psychology, 37(6), 822-832.[2] George, J. M. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 191-202.[3] Etemadi, M., Darab, M. G., Khorasani, E., Moradi, F., & Vazirinasab, H. (2015). Social loafing among nurses and its relation with organizational justice. International Journal of Educational and Psychological Researches, 1(2), 125.[4] Bennett, N., & Naumann, S. E. (2005). Understanding and Preventing Shirking, Job Neglect, Social Loafing, and Free Riding. Managing organizational deviance, 113-129.Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.[5] Aggarwal, P., & O'Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255-264.[6] Murphy, S. M., Wayne, S. J., Liden, R. C., & Erdogan, B. (2003). Understanding social loafing: The role of justice perceptions and exchange relationships. Human relations, 56(1), 61-84.[7] Mortazavi, S., Hakimi, H., Soori, N., & Gholizade, R. (2011). Investigation of perception of justice and trust on teams social loafing in knowledge sharing: Research and development teams in Mashhad Industrial Town. Exec Manage Bull, 3, 137-62. [8] Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30(2), 285-304.[9] Lin, T. C., & Huang, C. C. (2009). Understanding social loafing in knowledge contribution from the perspectives of justice and trust. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 6156-6163.[10] Greenberg J. (1990), “Looking Fair Being Fair: Managing Impressions of Organizational Justice”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 12(1), pp. 57-111.[11] Bies, R. J. (2001). Interactional (injustice: The sacred and the profane. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 89-118).[12] Lipponen, J., Olkkonen, M. E., & Myyry, L. (2004). Personal value orientation as a moderator in the relationships between perceived organizational justice and its hypothesized consequences. Social Justice Research, 17(3), 275-292.[13] Simms, A., & Nichols, T. (2014). Social loafing: a review of the literature. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 15(1), 58.[14] Ingham, A. G., Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringelmann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(4), 371-384.[15] Williams, K., Harkins, S. G., & Latané, B. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrant to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 303.[16] Ferrante, C. J., Green, S. G., & Forster, W. R. (2006). Getting more out of team projects: Incentivizing leadership to enhance performance. Journal of Management Education, 30(6), 788-797.[17] Kaneshiro, P. (2008). Analyzing the organizational justice, trust, and commitment relationship in a public organization (Doctoral dissertation, [Sl: sn]).
Tính hững hờ tập thể đề cập đến xu hướng của cá nhân trong nhóm ít nỗ lực hơn để đạt mục tiêu so với khi cá nhân đó làm việc độc lập, và nó chịu tác động của sự công bằng tổ chức. Nghiên cứu này tìm hiểu mối quan hệ giữa công bằng tổ chức và tính hững hờ tập thể của các doanh nghiệp tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh thông qua phân tích định lượng. Kết quả cho thấy chỉ có hai yếu tố là công bằng phân phối và công bằng thủ tục có tác động ngược chiều đến tính hững hờ tập thể của nhân viên.
 
Publisher Vietnam National University, Hanoi
 
Date 2017-12-07
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Identifier https://js.vnu.edu.vn/EAB/article/view/4117
10.25073/2588-1108/vnueab.4117
 
Source VNU Journal of Science: Economics and Business; Vol 33 No 4
Chuyên san Kinh tế và Kinh doanh; Vol 33 No 4
2588-1108
2615-9287
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://js.vnu.edu.vn/EAB/article/view/4117/3828
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2017 VNU Journal of Science: Economics and Business