Record Details

A Study on Regime Type and Globalization in Simultaneous Equation Framework

Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title A Study on Regime Type and Globalization in Simultaneous Equation Framework
 
Creator Sudhanshu K. Mishra
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.affiliation.name## North-Eastern Hill University
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.email.name## mishrasknehu@hotmail.com
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.jel.name## C30, C36, C51, C57, C61, C71, F63.
 
Subject Simultaneous equations model; Two-Stage Least Squares; Instrumental Variables; Collinearity; Shapley Value Regression; Democracy Index; Globalization Index.
 
Description In this study we build a simultaneous equation model in which the measures of different aspects of globalization (attributable to KOF) and different aspects of democracy (attributable to EIU) are related in seven structural equations. A bi-directional relationship between democracy and globalization is visualized. The model is estimated by the conventional 2-SLS as well as a modified 2-SLS in which Shapley value regression is used at the second stage of 2-SLS. On the basis of our analysis, we document several findings. First, we find that democracy and globalization promote each other and hence there is a bi-directional causality with positive relationships running both ways between democracy and globalization. At a national level, there may be various intermediary conditions that modify the relationship as well as set in motion a complex of positive and/or negative feedbacks to accelerate or retard the pace of globalization and democratization in a country-specific manner. However, when a large number of countries are studied, a clear relationship emerges out. Second, there is a need to estimate the structural coefficients of the model cautiously since the regression equations may be suffering from collinearity among the predictor variables. The Shapley value regression based 2-SLS has performed better than the conventional regression in estimating the structural parameters of the model. Third, the system methods of estimation of the model gives better results than what are obtained by the single equation methods of estimation of structural parameters of the model.
 
Source Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.year.name## 2018
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.volume.name## 2
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.issue.name## 1
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.pages.name## 99-128
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.doi.name## 10.1991/jefa.v2i1.a14
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.pdfurl.name## https://ojs.tripaledu.com/index.php/jefa/article/download/34/28
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.pdfformat.name## application/pdf
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.htmlurl.name## https://ojs.tripaledu.com/index.php/jefa/article/view/34/33
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.htmlformat.name## text/html
 
Publisher Tripal Publishing House
 
Contributor
 
Date 2018-01-19
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Identifier https://ojs.tripaledu.com/index.php/jefa/article/view/34
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.onlineissn.name## 2521-6619
 
##plugins.schemas.dc.fields.printissn.name## 2521-6627
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://ojs.tripaledu.com/index.php/jefa/article/view/34/28
https://ojs.tripaledu.com/index.php/jefa/article/view/34/33
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Economics and Financial Analysis
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0