Record Details

Corporate Governance and Public Reprimand

Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Corporate Governance and Public Reprimand
 
Creator Embong, Zaini
Md Radzi, Ruhaznawati
 
Subject Public reprimand; board characteristics; audit committee; Bursa Malaysia
 
Description Public reprimand is a form of enforcement actions taken by Bursa Malaysia against companies that violate listing requirements, with intention to deter future breach and to cultivate good standards of corporate governance and business conduct in the market. Corporate governance is put in place to ensure that companies are managed to the best interest of shareholders. Empirical evidences show that corporate governance and enforcement actions are significantly related. However, none of the studies are done in Malaysian setting. The nature of capital market and the rules and regulations of relevant authority are different from country to country. Hence, it is important to investigate whether enforcement actions is also related to corporate governance in Malaysia. When companies were reprimanded, their reputations and most often share prices will be affected, compromising the wealth of shareholders. If actions were not taken by the relevant authority, confidence in the market may subside and this will affect the development of capital market. The reprimand should also serves as educating mechanism in which the affected companies are expected not to repeat the same offence. This has yet to be investigated. This study therefore extends existing knowledge on public reprimand by providing empirical evidence on Malaysia setting and more importantly whether or not public reprimand serves as educating mechanism. This study employs a cross-section, match-pair design with a sample of 110 companies. Results from logistic regression indicate that there are significant differences in board characteristics between companies that have been reprimanded and those which are not. The test on board characteristics two years after public reprimand however shows that there is no significant changes in board characteristics. Small sample size is among limitations of this study. The findings give insight on the role of enforcement actions in regulating companies and what need to be done by authority.
 
Publisher Penerbit UKM
 
Contributor —
 
Date 2017-12-15
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://ejournal.ukm.my/ajac/article/view/23524
10.17576/AJAG-2017-08SI-15
 
Source Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance; Vol 8 (2017): Special Issue; 165-176
2180-3838
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://ejournal.ukm.my/ajac/article/view/23524/8256
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2018 Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance