Record Details

‘No sanctuary’: Missed opportunities in health and social services for homeless people with dyslexia?

Social Work and Social Sciences Review

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title ‘No sanctuary’: Missed opportunities in health and social services for homeless people with dyslexia?
 
Creator Macdonald, Stephen J; University of Sunderland
Deacon, Lesley; University of Sunderland
 
Description This paper examines the relationship between dyslexia, homelessness and access to health and social services. This is a quantitative study analysing data from the Multiple Exclusion Homelessness across the United Kingdom Survey. Data was collected from 443 participants who had experienced some form of homelessness in the UK. A comparison was made between people with dyslexia and those homeless people without this condition. The data findings in this paper appear to reveal that people with dyslexia are overrepresented within the survey’s homeless population. It may be expected that people with dyslexia might not come in contact with health professionals and social workers as support for this condition generally takes place within an educational environment. Yet this study seems to indicate that homeless people with dyslexia have greater contact with health professionals and social workers compared with non-dyslexic homeless people. This paper suggests that health and social services need to consider conditions like dyslexia in order to develop support for this particular group of people that have experienced homelessness.
 
Publisher Whiting & Birch Ltd
 
Contributor
 
Date 2015-05-19
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://journals.whitingbirch.net/index.php/SWSSR/article/view/800
10.1921/swssr.v17i3.800
 
Source Social Work and Social Sciences Review; Vol 17, No 3: Disability and Enabling Approaches; 78-93
1746-6105
0953-5225
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://journals.whitingbirch.net/index.php/SWSSR/article/view/800/872
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2015 Social Work and Social Sciences Review