Record Details

The entanglement of the stuff and practice of human service work: A case for complexity

Social Work and Social Sciences Review

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title The entanglement of the stuff and practice of human service work: A case for complexity
 
Creator Emslie, Michael; RMIT University
 
Description The fact that social welfare professions including social work, youth work and community work deal with the lives and relationships of human beings is far from controversial. What is contentious is that in light of increasing intellectual work on the nature of social practices there is a failure in the human services literature to adequately examine the interdependencies and entanglements between conceptualisations of the stuff that the helping professions deals with and understandings of practice. This article examines the nexus and mediations between the phenomena and practice of social service work. The case is made that human services and the human beings they deal with are often imagined and represented in one-dimensional, unambiguous, calculable and orderable ways that align with neo-liberal inspired and technical approaches to practice. I argue that these accounts are inadequate and I suggest that practices of care and the people engaged in such practices should be constituted as complex, unpredictable, wicked and emergent. A key to good practice in the people professions is acknowledging and attending to this complexity and aporia.
 
Publisher Whiting & Birch Ltd
 
Contributor
 
Date 2016-05-05
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
application/pdf
 
Identifier https://journals.whitingbirch.net/index.php/SWSSR/article/view/896
10.1921/swssr.v18i2.896
 
Source Social Work and Social Sciences Review; Vol 18, No 2; 25-42
1746-6105
0953-5225
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://journals.whitingbirch.net/index.php/SWSSR/article/view/896/941
https://journals.whitingbirch.net/index.php/SWSSR/article/view/896/941
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2016 Social Work and Social Sciences Review