Record Details

Missing and misdiagnosis on the autism spectrum: Potential consequences and implications for practice

Social Work and Social Sciences Review

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Missing and misdiagnosis on the autism spectrum: Potential consequences and implications for practice
 
Creator Jones, Glenys; University of Birmingham
 
Description he aim of this paper is to explore the current criteria for giving a diagnosis of autism, the potential benefits of diagnosis and the reasons why this may be missed or misdiagnosed and the possible consequences. It considers whether diagnosis is always necessary and if so, for whom and when. If diagnosis is made to inform intervention, does this happen and from whose perspective and what is the research evidence for current approaches in autism? As there is no definitive medical or genetic test for diagnosing autism, then it is always subjective and diagnostic rates will vary across services and within and between local authorities. The case is made that professionals need to develop ways to ensure that autistic individuals who would benefit from an autism diagnosis are identified so that their needs are met in a timely and appropriate way to prevent the development of mental health problems and to enable a good quality of life. Finally, focusing on the positive aspects of autism and enhancing the wellbeing of parents, carers and the staff in schools and settings should have positive outcomes for all.
 
Publisher Whiting & Birch Ltd
 
Contributor
 
Date 2015-12-07
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://journals.whitingbirch.net/index.php/SWSSR/article/view/846
10.1921/swssr.v18i1.846
 
Source Social Work and Social Sciences Review; Vol 18, No 1: Austerity and some contemporary challenges for professionalism; 15-30
1746-6105
0953-5225
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://journals.whitingbirch.net/index.php/SWSSR/article/view/846/922
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2015 Social Work and Social Sciences Review