Since 2014
Constitutional Interpretation of Romania: Post modernity
The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration
View Archive Info| Field | Value | |
| Title |
Constitutional Interpretation of Romania: Post modernity
|
|
| Creator |
P. RATHNASWAMY; Wollega University
Marilena Oana Nedelea; 'Ştefan cel Mare' University of Suceava, Romania |
|
| Description |
Austria had in 1920 Constitutional Court followed by Italy in 1946, Germany in 1949, Romania in 1989, South Africa in 1991, and Ethiopia in 1995. Each Constitution has its provisions on the constitutional interpretation. Romania has its own provisions and it is considered here its legality and the best possible measures and recommendations for future. Judicial power is vested in judiciary to interpret constitution, laws, and actions of other organs of government. Judicial review is the function resulted upon judicial power. Political body joins through the appointment of its members in the judicial review and it limits the independence of judiciary. It also reduces the values of separation of powers. Challenges and opportunities of growth and development do influence the spirit of separation of powers and judicial independence. The principle of inherent judicial power in judiciary inducts upon the constitutional interpretation. Thus, the principles of constitutional interpretation are varying in Romania and other similar constitutional courts of Germany, Ethiopia, and Italy but not in South Africa.
|
|
| Publisher |
Editura Universitatii Ştefan cel Mare din Suceava
|
|
| Contributor |
—
|
|
| Date |
2017-08-07
|
|
| Type |
—
— |
|
| Format |
application/pdf
|
|
| Identifier |
http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/ojs/index.php/annals/article/view/979
|
|
| Source |
The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration; Vol 17, No 1(25) (2017); 176-182
The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration; Vol 17, No 1(25) (2017); 176-182 |
|
| Language |
en
|
|