Record Details

Economics and how Obama could have lost the 2016 election too

Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Economics and how Obama could have lost the 2016 election too
 
Creator WU, Cheng K.; Growonders Corp.
 
Subject Consumption; Martingale; Savings; Growth; Income; Election; Trade.
E12; E21; J30; F41; B00.
 
Description Abstract. During the 2016 U.S. election, many voters from democratic (‘blue wall’)states, which have voted consistently in the past elections for the democrats, suddenly moved back into the Republican fold.  During this election, the primary economic issue was supposed to be NAFTA, both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump claimed it has been responsible for U.S. manufacturing job losses. So, what is the effect of trade on personal income and in particular manufacturing income and employment? Still, manufacturing losses are unlikely to explain democratic losses in rural areas, such as Wisconsin, where farm voters switched parties. What is the relationship between farm income and election result? Finally, are farmers Republican, Democrat or Independent?  Or just pragmatic?Keywords. Consumption, Martingale, Savings, Growth, Income, Election, Trade.JEL. E12, E21, J30, F41, B00.
 
Publisher Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences
Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences
 
Contributor —
 
Date 2017-09-18
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
—
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://www.kspjournals.org/index.php/JSAS/article/view/1430
10.1453/jsas.v4i3.1430
 
Source Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences; Vol 4, No 3 (2017): September; 283-288
Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences; Vol 4, No 3 (2017): September; 283-288
2149-0406
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://www.kspjournals.org/index.php/JSAS/article/view/1430/1406
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0