Record Details

Development of Novel Robust Reputation Evaluation Method for Dynamic Federation of Clouds

Social and Basic Sciences Research Review

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title Development of Novel Robust Reputation Evaluation Method for Dynamic Federation of Clouds
 
Creator Alguliyev, Rasim
Abdullayeva, Fargana
 
Subject collaborative decision making, intelligent agent, reputation, dynamic federation, confederation,
 
Description In the presented paper, a new fuzzy collaborative IntRep hybrid reputation model based on intellectual agents is proposed for dynamic cloud federalization. The model construction is carried out in three stages. In the first stage, the assessment of an entity is conducted based on the particular criteria set using the intellectual agents. Although intellectual agents use the same criteria; as they generate different opinions for the solution of the same problem, in the second stage fuzzy opinions are formulated by applying fuzzification method to provide their participation of all different opinions in the evaluation process. In the third stage, a single opinion is formulated by aggregating those fuzzy opinions using the optimization and defuzzification methods and. Based on the specified opinion, the identification provider is classified as either trustworthy or malicious. For the purpose of verification of authenticity of the method, numerical calculations based on data provided by three multi-agents are illustrated. The calculations carried out during the experimental verification of the proposed method are conducted using Matlab software package.
 
Publisher Academy of Business & Scientific Research (ABSR)
 
Date 2016-02-01
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier http://absronline.org/journals/index.php/sbsrr/article/view/624
 
Source Social and Basic Sciences Research Review; Vol 4 No 2 (2016): February; 56-62
2313-6758
 
Language eng
 
Relation http://absronline.org/journals/index.php/sbsrr/article/view/624/644
 
Rights Copyright (c) 2016 Social and Basic Sciences Research Review