Contingenza e retribuzione protetta: una risposta
Moneta e Credito
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
Contingenza e retribuzione protetta: una risposta
|
|
Creator |
CASSONE, A.
MARCHESE, C. SCACCIATI, F. |
|
Subject |
—
Spaventa, protected pay E24, E31, J30 |
|
Description |
In a recent article Luigi Spaventa raised some criticisms of the methodology the authors use to determine the level of protected pay in their book Inflazione e Salari (Inflation and Wages). In this brief note the authors respond to Spaventa’s criticism and explain why the choice made by them is justified.
|
|
Publisher |
Associazione Economia civile
|
|
Contributor |
—
|
|
Date |
2014-03-25
|
|
Type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Articolo peer-review |
|
Format |
application/pdf
|
|
Identifier |
http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/monetaecredito/article/view/11819
|
|
Source |
Moneta e Credito; Vol 30, N° 118 (1977)
Moneta e Credito; Vol 30, N° 118 (1977) 2037-3651 |
|
Language |
ita
|
|
Relation |
http://ojs.uniroma1.it/index.php/monetaecredito/article/view/11819/11635
|
|
Rights |
Copyright (c) 2016 A. CASSONE, C. MARCHESE, F. SCACCIATI
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
|