Record Details

The fairness of affi rmative action: In the eye of the beholder

Southern African Business Review

View Archive Info
 
 
Field Value
 
Title The fairness of affi rmative action: In the eye of the beholder
 
Creator Coetzee, M
Bezuidenhout, M
 
Subject affi rmative action, distributive justice, procedural justice, interactional justice, employment equity, equality, discrimination
 
Description The purpose of this study was to identify the major components ofaffi rmative action (AA) fairness from an organisational justice pointof view and to measure the perceptions of employees on AA fairness.9A literature study and an empirical study were conducted. A questionnaire was developed to collect information on respondents’ biographical details and their perceptions of the fairness of AA. 10Using SPSS, principal axis factor analysis was performed on the data, with a Varimax rotation, in order to uncover the diff erent factors related to affi rmative action fairness. Four factors with latent roots greater than unity (Kaiser’s criteria) were extracted from the factor matrix of affi rmative action. The factors postulating affi rmative action fairness included interactional justice, procedural justice (input), procedural justice (criteria) and distributive justice. 11The infl uence and eff ect of the biographical variables on fairness perceptions were determined by comparing the responses of various employee subsets with one another by means of univariate andmultivariate analysis of variance. The results of the t-tests revealedthat staff category and ethnicity have a statistically signifi canteff ect on employees’ perceptions of the distributive justice of AA.Decisions such as granting AA employees token positions, payingunrealistically high salaries to AA managers and appointing lessqualified AA employees play a key role when employees form perceptions of the fairness of AA. This study contributes to a better understanding of the dimensionality of employee perceptions of AA fairness. It should assist organisations with the knowledge required for more eff ective management of AA in the workplace.
 
Publisher College of Economic and Management Sciences (UNISA)
 
Contributor
 
Date 2012-05-14
 
Type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
 
Format application/pdf
 
Identifier https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sabr/article/view/76400
 
Source Southern African Business Review; Vol 15, No 2 (2011)
1998-8125
1561-896X
 
Language eng
 
Relation https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sabr/article/view/76400/66858
 
Rights Copyright on articles is retained by the author(s).  The editor and reviewers of SABR cannot accept any responsibility for the infringement of authors' rights or copyright.