Comment on Feige's Paper "Reflections on the Meaning and Measurement of Unobserved Economies: What Do We Really Know About the 'Shadow Economy'?
Journal of Tax Administration
View Archive InfoField | Value | |
Title |
Comment on Feige's Paper "Reflections on the Meaning and Measurement of Unobserved Economies: What Do We Really Know About the 'Shadow Economy'?
|
|
Creator |
Schneider, Friedrich
|
|
Description |
This comment provides a reply to Prof. Feige’s paper with the title “Reflections on the Meaning and Measurement of Unobserved Economies: What do we really know about the ‘Shadow Economy’?”, in which Prof. Feige heavily criticizes me. I show that the same critique which Prof. Feige raises against me can be put forward to his results on the non-observed economy. Moreover, I show that my dataset is appropriately documented, and I also address the problem of calibration and normalization issues when undertaking a MIMIC estimation. In the concluding section, I suggest that a joint paper should be written in which all the pros and cons of each method of estimating the size and development of the non-observed/shadow economy are presented and criticized.
|
|
Publisher |
Journal of Tax Administration
|
|
Contributor |
—
|
|
Date |
2016-10-31
|
|
Type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
|
Format |
application/pdf
|
|
Identifier |
http://JoTA.website/article/view/108
|
|
Source |
Journal of Tax Administration; Vol 2, No 2 (2016)
2059-190X |
|
Language |
eng
|
|
Relation |
http://JoTA.website/article/view/108/76
|
|
Rights |
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Tax Administration
|
|